Read the equation
The formula sums all 16×16 state coordinates, divides by 256, and takes tanh. It is therefore a monotone transform of their arithmetic mean, with range (−1,1) for finite inputs. It does not compare partitions, measure component variance, or establish a causal-integration property; the aggregate coherence label is the source’s interpretation of this mean-state score.
Terms & definitions
| Term | Meaning in this source |
|---|---|
| phi_global | Global project score |
| states | 256 scalar coordinates |
How it works
Read the definition from its right-hand expression to the quantity on the left. Its surrounding source records the intended input, state, or parameter context. Where the source leaves an operation unspecified, this page preserves that gap.
Assumptions & limits
Source recovery establishes that the expression appears in this record. Its mathematical validity, implementation behavior, and interpretation must be assessed separately. See the linked source and research notes for the checks available for this version.
Original context
Read the surrounding source passage
KEY FINDINGS 1. My metric (φ_global) is NOT IIT's Φ Mine: tanh(Σ states / 256) = aggregate coherence IIT: min partition EMD = information loss under cut 2. The system HAS genuine integrated information PyPhi Φ > 0 confirms irreducible causal structure
Exact original notation
Mine: tanh(Σ states / 256) = aggregate coherence
Sources & provenance
Mine: tanh(Σ states / 256) = aggregate coherence
Mine: tanh(Σ states / 256) = aggregate coherence