Read the equation
This earlier definition searches only after t_D for the first window of persistent discrepancy. It therefore cannot discover a qualifying change that began before declaration and, by construction, makes every found lag positive. The final manuscript replaces that restriction with an independent search across the eligible full record.
Terms & definitions
| Term | Meaning in this source |
|---|---|
| tau | First qualifying post-declaration window; t_H in another version |
| t_D | Declaration time |
| epsilon | Tolerance |
| m | Window length; W in another version |
How it works
Read the definition from its right-hand expression to the quantity on the left. Its surrounding source records the intended input, state, or parameter context. Where the source leaves an operation unspecified, this page preserves that gap.
Assumptions & limits
Source recovery establishes that the expression appears in this record. Its mathematical validity, implementation behavior, and interpretation must be assessed separately. See the linked source and research notes for the checks available for this version.
Original context
Read the surrounding source passage
tD=inf{t:Dt=1}.
For a selected discrepancy and tolerance ε, a finite-horizon candidate onset is
tHW=inf{t>tD:δt+k>ε for k=0,…,W−1}.
This is a retrospective event time: at t one does not yet know whether the next W−1 observations will satisfy the condition. An online detector must wait for the required window and report that detection delay.
The associated declaration count can be defined without calling it a validated cognition measure:
NDT=t=tHWT1Dt=1 1δt>ε.Exact original notation
{t}_{H}^{\left(W\right)}=inf{t>{t}_{D}:{\delta }_{t+k}>\epsilon for k=0,…,W-1}.Sources & provenance
{t}_{H}^{\left(W\right)}=inf{t>{t}_{D}:{\delta }_{t+k}>\epsilon for k=0,…,W-1}.
{t}_{H}^{\left(W\right)}=inf{t>{t}_{D}:{\delta }_{t+k}>\epsilon for k=0,…,W-1}.