ThatAIguyA world of ideas

THE CONSCIOUSNESS ATLAS
Read. Experiment. Follow the evidence.

ConsciousnessLearn · Explore · Joseph Anady

Earlier post-declaration onset search

This earlier definition searches only after t_D for the first window of persistent discrepancy. It therefore cannot discover a qualifying change that began before declaration and, by construction, makes every found lag positive. The final manuscript replaces that…

Consciousness researchdocumented formula
Learn with the Atlas

Learn to read this model

Start with the symbols, follow the operations, and check what the result means.

Open guided lesson
eq-5e5c1984e2053fmathematical expression
tH(W)=inft>tD:δt+k>ϵfork=0,…,W−1.{t}_{H}^{\left(W\right)}=inf{t>{t}_{D}:{\delta }_{t+k}>\epsilon for k=0,…,W-1}.

Read the equation

This earlier definition searches only after t_D for the first window of persistent discrepancy. It therefore cannot discover a qualifying change that began before declaration and, by construction, makes every found lag positive. The final manuscript replaces that restriction with an independent search across the eligible full record.

Terms & definitions

TermMeaning in this source
tau

First qualifying post-declaration window; t_H in another version

t_D

Declaration time

epsilon

Tolerance

m

Window length; W in another version

How it works

Read the definition from its right-hand expression to the quantity on the left. Its surrounding source records the intended input, state, or parameter context. Where the source leaves an operation unspecified, this page preserves that gap.

Assumptions & limits

Source recovery establishes that the expression appears in this record. Its mathematical validity, implementation behavior, and interpretation must be assessed separately. See the linked source and research notes for the checks available for this version.

Original context

Read the surrounding source passage
tD=inf{t:Dt=1}.

For a selected discrepancy and tolerance ε, a finite-horizon candidate onset is

tHW=inf{t>tD:δt+k>ε for k=0,…,W−1}.

This is a retrospective event time: at t one does not yet know whether the next W−1 observations will satisfy the condition. An online detector must wait for the required window and report that detection delay.

The associated declaration count can be defined without calling it a validated cognition measure:

NDT=t=tHWT1Dt=1 1δt>ε.
Exact original notation
{t}_{H}^{\left(W\right)}=inf{t>{t}_{D}:{\delta }_{t+k}>\epsilon  for k=0,…,W-1}.

Sources & provenance

01
Machine_Consciousness_Mathematical_Audit.docx
paragraph 41, math 1 · Sep 17, 2026
{t}_{H}^{\left(W\right)}=inf{t>{t}_{D}:{\delta }_{t+k}>\epsilon for k=0,…,W-1}.
02
Machine_Consciousness_Mathematical_Audit.docx
paragraph 41, math 1 · Sep 17, 2026
{t}_{H}^{\left(W\right)}=inf{t>{t}_{D}:{\delta }_{t+k}>\epsilon for k=0,…,W-1}.

Search equations, builds, manuscript text, and recovered sources.