Read the equation
This is the factor-amplitude threshold used for one reported bend selection. It includes a checkpoint only if the selected factor-change magnitude reaches 0.002. The value is an analysis setting in factor coordinates; it is not a universal boundary for state change or cognition.
Terms & definitions
| Term | Meaning in this source |
|---|---|
| eta | Amplitude eligibility threshold |
How it works
Read the definition from its right-hand expression to the quantity on the left. Its surrounding source records the intended input, state, or parameter context. Where the source leaves an operation unspecified, this page preserves that gap.
Assumptions & limits
Source recovery establishes that the expression appears in this record. Its mathematical validity, implementation behavior, and interpretation must be assessed separately. See the linked source and research notes for the checks available for this version.
Original context
Read the surrounding source passage
The effective norm continues to grow after the early episode. Its value is 3.2626958 at 180, 4.4304871 at 300, and 5.3249906 at the final snapshot. Thus the early episode is not the point at which all subsequent computation ceases changing, nor is final-state similarity a universal indicator of a completed identity. 5.7 A turning point is present, but its selected location is conditional At the inspected source code’s amplitude threshold η=0.002, all three tested lags identify their largest local path bend at checkpoint 190. This is true both for B alone and for the effective matrix U. Lag in steps Eligible centers Peak checkpoint
Exact original notation
\eta =0.002