ThatAIguyA world of ideas

THE CONSCIOUSNESS ATLAS
Read. Experiment. Follow the evidence.

ConsciousnessLearn · Explore · Joseph Anady

Probability of zero reversions under independent checks

If each of N checks independently has the same reversion probability p, the chance of observing no reversion is (1−p)ᴺ. A finite record without a return therefore remains compatible with small positive reversion probabilities. The formula quantifies a sampling model;…

Consciousness researchdocumented formula
Learn with the Atlas

Learn to read this model

Start with the symbols, follow the operations, and check what the result means.

Open guided lesson
eq-9fb10ee4b3e451mathematical expression
P(zeroreversions)=(1−p)N.P\left(zero reversions\right)={\left(1-p\right)}^{N}.

Read the equation

If each of N checks independently has the same reversion probability p, the chance of observing no reversion is (1−p)ᴺ. A finite record without a return therefore remains compatible with small positive reversion probabilities. The formula quantifies a sampling model; correlated or unequal checks require another model.

Terms & definitions

TermMeaning in this source
p

Constant probability of reversion per check

N

Number of independent checks

How it works

Read the definition from its right-hand expression to the quantity on the left. Its surrounding source records the intended input, state, or parameter context. Where the source leaves an operation unspecified, this page preserves that gap.

Assumptions & limits

Source recovery establishes that the expression appears in this record. Its mathematical validity, implementation behavior, and interpretation must be assessed separately. See the linked source and research notes for the checks available for this version.

Original context

Read the surrounding source passage
9.4 Finite persistence cannot establish “never again” empirically

Suppose no return to baseline is observed in N independent checks. Under a constant independent reversion probability p,

Pzero reversions=1−pN.

The one-sided 95% upper bound is 1−0.051/N. For N=1000, it is about 0.002991 per check. It is not zero. Dependence between checks makes this simple bound less informative, not a proof of eternity.

A proof of permanent divergence is possible for a fully specified system when a forward-invariant set excludes the reference, as in the affine example. But that proves a property of those transition rules. A finite sequence of neural-model transcripts does not supply such a proof unless the required model and invariant are established independently.

10. A prospective study that would meaningfully test the proposal
Exact original notation
P\left(zero reversions\right)={\left(1-p\right)}^{N}.

Sources & provenance

01
Machine_Consciousness_Mathematical_Audit.docx
paragraph 254, math 1 · Sep 17, 2026
P\left(zero reversions\right)={\left(1-p\right)}^{N}.
02
Machine_Consciousness_Mathematical_Audit.docx
paragraph 254, math 1 · Sep 17, 2026
P\left(zero reversions\right)={\left(1-p\right)}^{N}.

Search equations, builds, manuscript text, and recovered sources.