Read the equation
The four components contribute 0.175, 0.15, approximately 0.20, and 0.1125, giving approximately 0.6375. The speed term is described as near one, so the exact result depends on the test’s elapsed-time calculation. This is an expected test score under chosen feature values, not a measured vendor outcome.
Terms & definitions
| Term | Meaning in this source |
|---|---|
| performance_score | Weighted example result |
How it works
Read the definition from its right-hand expression to the quantity on the left. Its surrounding source records the intended input, state, or parameter context. Where the source leaves an operation unspecified, this page preserves that gap.
Assumptions & limits
Source recovery establishes that the expression appears in this record. Its mathematical validity, implementation behavior, and interpretation must be assessed separately. See the linked source and research notes for the checks available for this version.
Original context
Read the surrounding source passage
if !row.interviewRate.Equal(decimal.RequireFromString("0.75")) {
t.Fatalf("interview_rate = %s, want 0.75 (1 interviewed + 2 placed of 4)", row.interviewRate)
}
if row.quality != nil {
t.Fatalf("quality must be withheld (NULL) below the ten evaluation floor, got %s", row.quality)
}
// performance_score = fill 0.5*0.35 + quality(neutral 0.5)*0.30 + speed(~1.0)*0.20 + interview 0.75*0.15
// = 0.175 + 0.15 + 0.20 + 0.1125 = 0.6375 (speed ~1.0 since submitted ~ requirement created).
if row.performanceScore.Sub(decimal.RequireFromString("0.6375")).Abs().GreaterThan(decimal.RequireFromString("0.01")) {
t.Fatalf("performance_score = %s, want ~0.6375", row.performanceScore)
}
}
// TestVendorScorecardQualityFloorReleasesAtTen proves the quality band average is withheld at nine evaluated
// submissions and released (published) at ten, the small cell floor. It seeds one vendor with exactly ten
// green evaluated submissions (quality one) and a second vendor with nine (quality withheld), so the floor is
// exercised on both sides. The quality it reports is the average of the frozen engine's own bands, never a
// recomputed score.Exact original notation
performance_score = fill 0.5*0.35 + quality(neutral 0.5)*0.30 + speed(~1.0)*0.20 + interview 0.75*0.15 = 0.175 + 0.15 + 0.20 + 0.1125 = 0.6375 (speed ~1.0 since submitted ~ requirement created).